Attorney-General Nicola Roxon and her predecessor Robert McClelland have been hailed as ‘heroes’ this week for dragging Australia’s domestic violence laws into the 21st Century.
The definition of domestic violence has been changed to include:
1. Stalking.
2. Repeated verbal abuse.
3. Intentionally damaging or destroying property. (Similar to what happened in Grant Hackett’s family home).
4. Preventing someone having contact with friends or family.
5. Cruelty to the family pet
The Family Law Act has been changed to also ask whether children have been exposed to domestic violence. This would apply if a child ‘sees or hears … or otherwise experiences the effects of family violence’.
Comedian and writer Catherine Deveny takes up the case against the critics of the changes. She writes:
“Nicola Roxon and all involved are today’s heroes after this magnificent triumph for victims of domestic violence.
This incredible justice has been met with tantrums from some, who I can only assume are abusers or sympathetic to abusers because they conveniently prop up many of their beliefs and prejudices. These people assert changes in the law will lead to an ‘avalanche’ of false claims by vindictive partners and that there are ‘millions’ of false rape and abuse claims. By women.
Top Comments
Just wondering why you are using references to american stats in relation to an australian law change.
I welcome the new laws but you state 95% of domestic violence victims are female and link to HURT who are renown for not referencing their stats and are also known for using selective stats from around the world and applying them here in AUS alone.
I was before the Ipswich Magistrate in October 2012 for a Domestic Violence Order under the new laws. I was told that there is no precedent for this and so the Magistrate and the police prosecutor both suggested that I not proceed with my application because I was self-representing. I had a panic attack. My matter was adjourned. It will be heard in February 2013 and I will once again be self-representing because no lawyer is prepared to take my case and be the first. No surprise that change takes so long and goes so slowly when experts are afraid to assist it to happen.