The arrest in New York at the weekend of International Monetary Fund chief, Dominique Strauss-Kahn has caused shockwaves around the world, and once again raised the topic of whether sexual mores and relations between men and women in France are different to those in Anglo-Saxon-dominated cultures like our own.
The French financier is facing charges that he sexually assaulted a maid in his New York hotel room. The maid alleges Strauss-Kahn, or DSK as he is known in his homeland, emerged naked from the bathroom when she came into his Sofitel hotel suite, grabbed her from behind and pulled her into the bedroom and attacked her.
Strauss-Kahn’s lawyer has denied any wrongdoing by his client, saying the head of one of the world’s most influential financial institutions and aspiring French presidential candidate will “vigorously defend” the charges made against him.
The news has caused a storm of controversry in France where DSK was widely touted as the man most likely to topple the current – and widely unpopular – French President, Nicolas Sarkozy in next year’s election. It has also opened the gate on a flood of older sexual harassment complaints against Strauss-Kahn – including by the French writer, Tristane Banon who claims she was the victim of an alleged sexual assault at the hands of the politician in 2002.
DSK’s arrest has in turn sparked elaborate conspiracy theories in France, where newspapers, radio and the online sphere are buzzing with claims and counter-claims that the former economics professor – renowned for his weakness for women – was lured into a carefully staged, politically-motivated honey trap.
Strauss-Kahn’s wife, the accomplished and respected French TV journalist Anne Sinclair, has spoken publically in defence of her husband, asserting that the charges will finally be found to be false. The reaction of the French electorate seems to be evenly divided between outrage and indifference (with those in the latter camp electing to react to the news with the Gallic shrug for which their nation is renowned).
Top Comments
The French divorce laws encode that infidelity is a fault. So go figure how the whole of French society is perceived as condoning infidelity. I for one, know that that code is alive and well. Just one of those French things that makes no sense.
so what do the conspiracy "he was set up" theorists think about the details that have been released about the maid being a widowed devout muslim who is reportedly devastated. is that all a lie too?
Well if he did do it he is a beast and needs to get thrown in jail.
And the lady needs all the support she can get.
But I don't think there is anything wrong with wondering if he may have been set up this early on. I mean, there is a massive political motive to get him out of the way.
It it is true through I really really feel for the lady and really wish her all the best.
I just dont think there is anything wrong with asking a few questions. =)
Then he must be guilty and assumed to be the evil business man that he is then eh?
or by your logic she is a lying whore who must be ignored like all those other pesky women who cry rape.
seriously, many women have come forward, including young girls. but no we better believe the rich white powerful man.
tell me FHB what this maid would want to achieve out of this whole situation?
By my logic she is not a whore. It's pretty low behaviour putting words in my mouth. I never said that and frankly you shouldn't have said it.
As for his age, wealth, gender, race - I don't see anyone discriminating except you by bringing that into it.
If there is proof, he will be convicted. As he said he did not so much as touch her, it will be VERY EASY to find out if he is lying, because forensic evidence will pick up so much as a residue of breathe.
No women who cries rape is pesky, she is not automatically to believed anymore than the person accused. That's fair, unless you believe in guilt by accusation until proven otherwise.
I don't feel like I have to decry the act of rape to state the obvious - That until the case is heard, neither I nor yourself know the outcome.
As for what she will achieve?
Money, money, money.
If he is found guilty there will be money to be sued for.
Do you realize that even if not a single shred of dna is found on her, it could still go to trial.
Do you realize that if he is innocent, he could still be convicted?
Do you realize that if she is lying and he is found not guilty, it will hurt real rape victims?