At least 25,000 people marched in capital cities of yesterday with one message – Bust the Budget.
Now, straight up, I’ll admit, I’m more left than right. But more importantly, I’d like to think I’m more right than wrong.
This week, a letter went viral. In it, Kaye Stirland spoke about the value of $7 and her own personal experience with hard times. What struck me about her story, her open letter to the Australian Treasurer Joe Hockey, is that no one ever really knows the struggles others are facing or the history behind the person they see standing before them.
I for one can afford to pay the $7 GP co-contribution and despite the fact that it irritates me that we already pay for our “free” visits to the GP each and every week via the Medicare levy (incorporated into our tax that is deducted from our wage), I would still probably have no issue paying it.
But what if one day I couldn’t afford that $7? What if, like Kaye, things unexpectedly turned to shit? If you think that this is something that won’t happen to you, then I wish you well in your bubble. Because not one of us, I repeat, no one, is immune to circumstance or good old fashioned bad luck.
So yes, worst case, I believe that those who can afford to pay the co-contribution, if necessary to help out Australia, should pay it. Those below a certain income level or those who possess a Health Care Card or who are our most vulnerable, should not.
Also, I can agree that Family Tax Benefit, Part B, when a family earns $100K or more, should be discontinued. If a family earns $100k a year, they really do not require assistance from the government. They’re doing alright.
The rest of the proposed budget though, on a whole, is unnecessary and unfair.
Top Comments
"If a family earns $100k a year, they really do not require assistance from the government. They’re doing alright."
And yet, this same government is proposing to hand $50,000 to individuals earning that much, even if their partner is a multi-billionaire, just to have a baby. And, in fact, they have to earn at least that much to qualify for the full entitlement.
So, $100,000 family = too rich for welfare.
But
$100,000 individual = needy and deserving of welfare.
Where are the jobs for people to do. The educated government and private sectors need to be concentrating their efforts in creating jobs. Not loosing jobs? People with jobs pay taxes, taxes go to the government to maintain health, education, transport, power etc. We elected and employed these people because they said they could do the job. They have proven otherwise.