By AMY STOCKWELL.
Remember this school-yard ditty?
“…First comes love, then comes marriage, then comes an excellent opportunity to think about superannuation before you have any children.”
No? OK, so it isn’t catchy, but it would be worthwhile if we could all chant this: if you’re going to have a baby, it’s a good time to think about your superannuation.
We’ve spoken over the past few weeks about the fact that many women are retiring with half the superannuation of men.
This is especially the case for women with children. In fact, new research from the Australia Institute has shown that over a lifetime, women with children earn 43% less than women without children – and they end up with less superannuation.
Just as an FYI, you should know that this post is sponsored by Australian Super. But all opinions expressed by the author are 100% authentic ad written in their own words.
But here’s the twist.
Men with children earn 25% more than men without children.
That’s right. Children actually boost men’s financial earnings over their lifetime.
Women with children earn less. Men with children earn more. It’s a funny ole world, right? A funny, inequitable, infuriating world…
As frustrating as this is, I’m going to suggest that this creates an opportunity to start a conversation about you and your partner’s superannuation – before one of you takes time away from paid work to raise kids.