We’re in the era of oversharing. Parental oversharing, in particular. Snapshots from children’s birthdays parties or playdates or mealtimes, once confined to dusty frame or plastic photo album, are now filed in feeds, stories and profile
We see the names, the faces, the milestones, the previously private family moments of even the most public people. Most are carefully curated for their audience, while some show the dirtier, more tiresome side of being a mum or dad.
But there’s one thing, or should that be person, that tends to be missing from all.
The nanny.
As a recent article in The New York Times noted, celebrity Instagram feeds almost never capture the person sharing in the care of their children; the person picking that child up from school, making their meals, bathing them, reading to them so that the parents can maintain their careers.
Kim Kardashian and Kanye West’s nanny – nowhere. The reported six nannies that care for Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie’s children – nowhere.
“Posting your nanny is like posting your address or your kids’ school,” lifestyle blogger Dikla Goren Dekel told the outlet. “It’s too much information.”
Top Comments
I don't want to sound harsh, but if you're a nanny, you're an employee and not a member of the family. Why would you be featured in family photos? And it's none of your business what your employers are putting on their personal social media about their kid's birthday party. As long as you're being paid properly and treated respectfully, you're not being treated as invisible and there really isn't anything to complain about.
Agree that nannies should not expect top billing in family photos et al, but I do agree with their point about people curating their lives to give the impression they do everything unassisted when in reality they are outsourcing big chunks of work to others.