For the last few months, I’ve had a new hobby: American Politics.
Actually, that’s a lie. It’s less American politics I’ve been consumed by and more Donald Trump — specifically, how much I hate him.
I can’t even begin to tell you how fixated I have become on the US election between Hillary Clinton, aka the most qualified person ever to run for President, and the man Rosie O’Donnell accurately describes as “the orange anus”.
I’ve had a few people ask me on my Facebook page why I’m so fixated on the US election campaign. It’s another country! Who cares!
And I’ve thought about this a lot myself because I really am fixated.
People who are scared of flying often describe a sensation of having to use their mind to keep the plane in the air during a flight. Like, if they stop concentrating for a moment, the plane might crash.
I feel a bit like this with this election.
The fact it’s in another country is almost irrelevant. It’s true that I wrote barely anything about our own election. I can’t even tell you how long ago it was. And that’s because the stakes felt so low. Turnbull and Shorten were both self-described feminists; intelligent men with a long history of experience who both believed in marriage equality and a republic. Basically, they were both pretty close to the centre.
LISTEN: Mia Freedman and Amelia Lester discuss Donald Trump and the most jaw-dropping moments of the election. (Post continues after audio.)
But with Trump and Clinton, that gap is so wide, so extreme, I feel like the stakes are IMPOSSIBLY high. America is the biggest superpower in the Western world. It has the capacity to impact all of us, not just economically, but also to start wars, finish them, and set the moral tone.
Top Comments
There is much evidence to show that Hilary and Bill are very shady characters. Trump is no choirboy either. However, it is possible for a man to be a misogynist and function as a president of the USA. After all Bill was president and we all know how badly he treated women. I don't know how Mia can turn a blind eye to Hilary being Bill's enabler
Where do you stand then on the attitude Hillary Clinton has taken towards the women her husband sexually assaulted? She's vilified these women and called them far worse names than those used by Trump. What about the 12 year old girl who was brutally raped by men in their 40s? Hillary Clinton was the lawyer who defended them and convinced an obviously brain dead jury that the little girl led them on and only had herself to blame. LED THEM ON???!!! How any woman could use that as a defence against two disgusting predators is beyond me. What sort of woman would even take on the defence of creatures like this?
I personally believe Donald Trump to be a megalomaniacal bully who I'd hate to see as US president but Hillary Clinton strikes me as sly and manipulative. By continuing to justify her husband's many sexual indiscretions, while at the same time vilifying his victims is just plain wrong. What message is this sending to women and girls all over the world? She's not presidential material either.
What are the names and statements Clinton has said about the women? I'm not questioning it, I've just never actually heard them and they aren't easy to find on Google.
But in regards to the second part, Clinton was the court appointed lawyer for the accused. If she did not do her job properly, they would of been let off. This is the basis of our Western judicial system, you should know this.
(Also, I can't find anything stating she used the 'led them on' statement as a defence.)
Bill didn't sexually assault women, he had no victims. He had consensual affairs. A big difference. And I don't know any woman who would have 'positive' attitude on women who were screwing her husband. Hillary is pretty mild compared to what most wives would call the homewrecker.
I don't think she really had much of a choice as the judge requested her. There was also no jury involved (the defendant pled guilty to a lesser charge). As far as I know Hilary didn't claim that the victim led the defendant on, but rather that others had said she had a history of 'fantasising about persons, claiming they had attacked her body'. Like you I resent the fact that she represented this man and did a darn good job of it. Sure, she was simply doing her job as a public defender (an important job, if the justice system is to remain fair) but it seemed as though it was pretty clear this guy was guilty and he should not have got away with such a light sentence. From what I've read, she really did everything in her power to defend him, including requesting a psychiatric evaluation of the child which just seems cruel given the circumstances. That being said, as much as I'm not a huge fan or her or her husband, the idea of her becoming president doesn't fill me with dread as much as that of her opponent. I feel that a third world war could be on the horizon if Trump were to win.
Clinton was working for legal aid in the case you've mentioned. She was DOING HER JOB. Sometimes lawyers get cases they don't necessarily approve of. Would you rather those men weren't provided with a lawyer at all?