I’m calling it.
Meg Ryan got up on stage at the 70th Annual Tony Awards last weekend and instead of talking about the black actors who made history by winning all four musical acting categories, all anyone wanted to talk about was her face.
Ryan, who in her heyday was the perennial girl next door who bumbled through romantic comedies looking cute in oversized T-shirts and socks – had undergone something of a transformation.
With an enhanced pout and suspiciously smooth brow, she looked very little like the Meg Ryan we had come to love.
Listen to Mia Freedman, Kate de Brito and Monique Bowley discuss Meg Ryan’s transformation. Post continues…
Social media lit up with commentary and criticism of Ryan’s new look, just as it had in the past when other actresses were suspected of dabbling with cosmetic procedures. Uma Thurman. Courtney Cox. Kim Novak.
People said she had taken things “too far”. Some likened her to The Joker. Some simply lamented the loss of her wholesome good looks.
And then, inevitably, others fired back, defending Ryan’s right to do anything she wished with her face.
Part of me wanted to agree. Meg Ryan is her own person. Of course she is. She can do whatever the hell she wants to her face and body.
But still, I can’t help feeling sad.
Not just for Meg, but for all women – for all of us who live in a society that tells us we need to look a certain way to be worthwhile.
Top Comments
I don't think she looks bad after surgery. It's all in our minds. I've seen no article about her plastic surgery which doesn't compare her "look after" with an image at least 14 years old, saying "before". Most images are more than 20 years old, still saying "before". I didn't see a picture of her from the year before her surgery.
Plastic surgery is a wide field, beginning with teeth implants and crowns, and is in its heavier outcome very common in the hollywood biz for decades. Even Marylin Monroe was suspected of minor PS before her career begun, as I remember. That's 50 years ago.
For an actor or an actress PS is an investment. Even at older age, there is a certain view required, where at least the audience has to wonder "how is he/she that old and looks so young ?".
Some people are luckier than others. It might have to do with (no) smoking and drinking, but to some people the effects of aging are less harsh than to others.
Less lucky persons are urged earlier to correct their appearance in order to meet the expectations people have for them, or at least seem to have.
Got no job ? - Undergo surgery. That may have driven Meg Ryan to her decision. Others may have other reasons. But I have just read about a british actor who had hair implants, because he was afraid of getting no job.
Because it's possible now to watch entire shows dedicated to that theme ('Botched'...), doesn't make PS an important problem of our culture, that has to be adressed. It's the next step of makeup. If it's well done, why not. I personally know two women, who had breast enlargement, and one who had reduction. They are all happy whith it (and with the large amounts of money spent).
Meg Ryan made millions of dollars despite being only mildly talented as an actress by trading on her looks and playing cutsie. Of course she is doing all she can to hold onto the cutsie youthful image that was her source of income. Jodie Foster, Maggie Smith, Helen Mirren etc are able to age gracefully because their income was based on genuine acting ability. Arguing that looks shouldn't matter after a long career of trading on your looks is sour grapes. The feminist issue isn't that women's value automatically declines with age, it is that people with minimal skills or talent can briefly significantly out-earn genuinely talented people and then cry foul when the system no-longer unfairly favours them.