Lindsay Lohan is not your average woman – or is she?
Lohan is rich, famous and a popular Hollywood A-lister who has reportedly enjoyed the affections of a long list of high-profile hunks including Adam Levine, Justin Timberlake, Zac Efron, Joaquin Phoenix and Colin Farrell.
Usually called “troubled” because of her very long and public battle with the bottle, the Mean Girls star, over the past 10 months, seemed to be turning over a less “rocky” page in her life as she settled into a happy (from the outside at least) relationship with her billionaire playboy fiancé Egor Tarabasov.
But that picture-perfect tale of a troubled princess finding her Prince Charming was torn asunder with the release of a video showing Tarabasov grabbing Lohan, twisting her arm behind her back and forcing her to hand over a mobile phone.
As the images made their way around the globe, some people asked, ‘What did Lohan do to incite Tarabasov’s public show of brutality?’ while others intimated the former child star got what she ‘deserved’ because she is not what most of us perceive to be a “good girl”.
In the moment that Tarabasov assaulted her, Lohan became another public face of domestic violence – just like Nigella Lawson, Rihanna and Amber Heard before her.
Lohan revealed that Tarabasov’s abuse was not a one-off. She said that he, like most violent men, conducted his control and abuse behind closed doors, rarely showing others the devastating Mr Hyde that lingers beneath the charming facade of his Dr Jekyll exterior.
We can only hope that Lohan has strong circles of support because the coming days and weeks are going to be some of the worst as she decides whether or not her future is safe and if it has any room for Tarabasov.
Top Comments
Interstingly you actually acknowledge that men are also often domestic violence victims (some 33% or 1 in 3, take your pick) then go on to declare: "Domestic violence victims are every woman and every woman is a potential domestic violence victim." Why is this appalling treatment that affects both men, women & everyone in between, have to be gendered into a women only issue? I realize the government funding to address this issue is limited, but by the logic of statistics alone $1 in every $3 of taxpayer's money spent on addressing DV should be spent on male victims. But instead we forsake these men & boys to remain trapped in these dangerous & abusive relationships by telling them they are the source of the problem & deserve this treatment as per the 'Duluth wheel' & do nothing.
if you have real evidence to back up your story you would receive funding. your fallacy is ignored by government funding because it is a delusion in the heads of violent men. All these men being beaten to a pulp by female partners are being covered up. We have convinced all police, ambos, doctors, nurses, pathologists, coroners and even funeral directors to cover up the violence against men (by wives), then we controlled all the media so that no male victims are reported, then we moved onto government departments to convince them not to fund services for males (ignore the men's help line - it doesn't exist). As a man with incredible knowledge of 30% of all assaults and deaths (d.v) involving male victims I am guessing you and your friends are offering safe refuge to these males? That is what women do. Refuges don't accommodate the majority of victims therefore family and friends assist others. Do you have any court cases rather than anecdotes to show these 30% male victims of assaults and deaths?