I am a very bad 1950s housewife. You can tell because, at 8:55 p.m., on the coldest night of Autumn so far, I am frantically running through the streets of my neighborhood in a cocktail dress, a winter coat and rain boots, trying to get to a grocery store that closes at 9 because I need to buy all of the ingredients to make a pumpkin pie right now.
I am running because I thought the store closed at 10… and also because I had spent the past hour-and-a-half on Twitter, eating Tostitos and Google image-searching “Michael Stipe hats” and had lost track of the time. Told you I was a bad ’50s housewife.
Whenever I’d imagined myself in the ’50s, it was always as more of a Holly Golightly type — free-wheeling, mysterious, possibly a prostitute — than a Donna Reed type. So, when my editor approached me to try out a ’50s lifestyle for a week, I was incredulous. I’m 32, unmarried, childless, living in sin with my boyfriend and am obsessed with my career, fart jokes and podcasts about murder. I’m also a bad cook, mouthy and disorganised. In the actual ’50s, I probably would have been burned at the stake, or at the very least, prescribed some very fun pills.
But my editor wasn’t offering me any fun pills (as usual). So what the hell could someone like me get from living like a ’50s housewife for a week? In the interest of history/sociology/a good joke, I dug into some advice texts from the ’50s and decided to find out.
Top Comments
I will never have the choice to be a 50s housewife. Feminism took that choice from me.
50s housewives didn't have choices.
I'm pretty sure your comment was tongue in cheek but if not I'd like to know how. If you want to do the little house wife thing you can, you may have to live with a single wage and that might well be difficult but I hardly think that is the fault of feminism. I also believe there were many women with independent minds and who made decisions independently of their husband and in also in conjunction with their husband just like now.
Is there a law against being a housewife?
The tax system used to recognise the sharing of income that naturally occurs between spouses when there is just one breadwinner. Today the breadwinner is effectively treated as a rich, single earner for tax purposes (but not welfare or Family Court purposes).
As a result, single-income families get half the tax-free threshold of two-income families. Even a wealthy two-income family gets double the tax-free threshold of a low-income family with one breadwinner - and two of every other tax threshold.
Despite this, even if the at-home spouse is actively looking for a paid job, they will not qualify for unemployment benefits unless the "family income" is exceptionally low.
The system has long been skewed against single-income couples.
I do wish that decent table manners and etiquette were still popular as it is revolting the way many people eat these days. Shovelling food into their mouths, eating with their mouths open, licking their knives, heads bent so close to their plate they could almost discard any silverware. As for spitting cherry stones, no need to add anything more...............
'Shovelling food into their mouths, eating with their mouths open,'
But food is supposed to enter the mouth.