We need to stop taxing periods. Period.
While watching Monday night’s episode of Q&A a surprising — and rare — thing happened to me. I found myself agreeing with Joe Hockey.
When asked by a student if he thought sanitary products were essential goods for half the population, the Treasurer agreed (after a moment of red-faced squirming, obviously).
Then, when asked if he believed the products should be taxed accordingly, ie. that menstruating Australians shouldn’t have to pay an extra 10% GST on pads and tampons each month, again, he said ‘yes’. Or rather he said: “It probably should, yes. The answer is yes.”
It went a little something like this:
Applause all round.
This new, agreeable Hockey even went so far as to promise to lobby the states on the matter at the next Treasurer’s meeting in July and, after the program, released a statement saying he had instructed his department to cost the proposal.
And so he should. Because just like condoms, lube, sunscreen and nicotine patches (which are all tax-free) tampons and pads should be classed as important health goods — and always should have been.
Watch the video in full here: Treasurer Joe Hockey agrees to lobby states to ditch GST on tampons, sanitary items after question from student on Q&A.
The Sydney University student who put the question to Hockey, Subeta Vimalarajah, is also behind the online petition Stop Taxing My Period!, which now has upward of 95,000 signatures and is the reason the issue has re-entered mainstream political debate and everybody’s newsfeeds.
Top Comments
Just to clarify, the GST is not a luxury tax as has been said here. As the name implies, it is for Goods and Services, even the carpenter making my outdoor table charges GST.
Shame when we had a female PM that this wasn't raised. Now Julia should have been an advocate for other women. So maybe Tony is following the female leader before him?