Why are we so shocked a SINGLE-MUM won The Bachelor?
Guys did you hear? I mean how could you not.
A single mum won The Bachelor last night. A single mum!!
Finally, finally us single mums are getting the recognition we deserve.
Finally the single mums of Australia can come out from hiding behind the stroller and say we are people too. We are WANTED.
We did it.
Recognition.
When Sam chose SINGLE-MUM Snezana Markoski over bikini-babe child-less and fancy free Lana Jeavons-Fellows it signaled that the tide has finally turned. We no longer need to hide our husband-hunting ways! We can stand proud, we can show the world that a single mum can get a man without resorting to lying on Ashley Madison.
If Sam Wood can choose a single mum surely there is hope for the rest of us huh?
I know it must have been a shock for the non-single mums out there. (You know those of you who don’t have the words “single-mum” prefacing your name each time it is mentioned.)
We all knew that Lana was a dead cert to win. In fact no one imagined that Sam would even dream of picking a woman with baggage – she was just there for the sympathy vote wasn’t she?
She didn’t stand a chance.
She may as well have had leprosy in the dismissive way she was written off as a contender – not because of her personality or because of any perceived lack of chemistry with the Bach – no, because of her daughter.
What man would honestly choose a single mother?
Top Comments
I am not surprised that he chose her.
Right at the beginning, whenter he met Snez and she told him that she had a child, he did say that he wanted a family of his own. Repeatedly. So he got an instant family. I just hope that this was the only reason that he chose her.
"Here’s the thing.
Single mums are not heroic. They are not martyrs and we
certainly don’t need saving. Despite the fact that single parent
families are the most financially disadvantaged families in Australia
they aren’t out to get your husband, or your money. They aren’t bad
decision makers or to the most part irresponsible (any more than some
partnered mothers are).?"
Well, that's just your OPINION. Why would you ignore the likes of Eva Cox or Elizabeth Broderick? These powerful and prominent feminists should know how females live and the man made adversity they are forced to endure which is why females should be paid for not working. Or should be paid the same for personal hygiene and baby sitting which is the hardest job in the world for a female. Otherwise being a parent is a bit too much for females. That's why women like Gail Kelly were held back because she had four kids. Females having to have babies is the reason there are few females at the top.
Further more, if a child was disadvantaged by living with the mother then the mother would do what is in the best interests of the child and give the child to his father. What sort of person are you that would disadvantage your own child?