According to former politician, Bill O’Chee, feminists hate bikinis, free parking and life.
Yesterday, former Queensland Senator, Bill O’Chee wrote a post bemoaning the fact that “feminists” object to Gold Coast Meter Maids. He’s here to defend Meter Maids from feminists who would deride them as representing an objectification of women.
He says, that “feminist commentators can’t have it both ways,” pointing out an apparent hypocrisy whereby feminists are cool with Elle McPherson wearing a bikini or undies, but not being ok with women in bikinis who “are not yet rich and famous” because “they epitomise the objectification of women.” He says the feminist mantra is “Girls can do anything, as long as we approve of it.”
In order to appreciate O’Chee’s comments, you need to have a little background on Gold Coast Meter Maids. The concept has been around on the Gold Coast for the past 50 years. Women in gold bikinis and hats wander around and pay for the parking of people visiting the Gold Coast. They used to put coins in meters; now they pay for parking in 11 minute increments and pop the receipt on the windscreen. They apparently save about 60 people from parking tickets every day.
Bill O’Chee wants us to stop condemning Meter Maids. Feminists need to “a sense of perspective and see the Meter Maids for what they are – a well executed marketing strategy that has brought billions of tourist dollars to the glamour strip over the last 50 years.”
That’s cool, Bill. The truth is, we don’t really give a shit. Feminists are not sitting around bagging out Meter Maids. Or bikini bar staff. Or women who work in promotions. We’re not in the game of bagging women at all.
Top Comments
Just a quick note - I've read articles that suggest that asexual women can also be (more) vulnerable to being sexually or indecently assaulted, largely because they aren't believed and listened to when resisting sexual advances.
P.S. I've never been a victim by the way. Just wanted to point it out.
The article keeps referring to feminists as 'we' as though it is some kind of intrinsic, tribal club doctrine.
I've been reading this site for some time and the concept of 'we' does not appear to hold water with many commentators here who will say I am a feminist, I just happen to disagree with topic xyz so obviously they cannot join your club.
Who makes the rules on what entitles someone to be part of the 'we' Club?