Us, dependent? No.
Last week, my 31-year-old friend Matilda* declared she and her boyfriend were moving in with her parents to save money.
“But, do you think it’s too loser-y?” she asked me.
My response: “No, do it. Maybe just don’t tell anyone you live with your folks…”
She and her partner both work full-time and make decent money, but are finding it hard to save up enough for a deposit on a first home (without, you know, giving up the overseas holidays and regular wining and dining).
Her younger sister and her respective boyfriend also recently moved back to family headquarters for the same reason.
“It’s not where I thought I’d be at 31,” my friend says.
“Neither of us are psyched about moving home – but you can’t argue with the numbers. The practicality is that we will save a lot in a year, which will allow us to get ahead.”
“I feel like I’m very lucky that my parents are pretty chilled out and we have a really good relationship, so it’s something we are all comfortable with.”
Matilda’s parents – who are retired and spent the last few years as empty nesters – will soon find their nest brimming with six adults, but they don’t mind.
“We’re more than happy to help,” Matilda’s mum says.
“We feel like we’re in a privileged position and if we can help our kids get ahead financially, we want to. We don’t see it as a burden, we enjoy having our kids under the same roof again. Now they’re older, we have a different relationship with them – it’s more like we are friends.”
Top Comments
It's a very Australian thing, the whole 'you're 17/18, you're out!' concept of family. Not only was it traditionally fuelled by our ridiculously inefficient concepts of housing and space, which are hardly relevant in a modern, waste-conscious, space-efficient society, but also resulted in generations who barely speak to one another, living apart and disconnected. I'd much prefer the European concept of family - family businesses, family homes, taking care of each other through the various, inevitable, stages of life. Doesn't mean you can't be independent, if you want, but there are surely far more benefits to keeping family stronger and together than flinging the components far and wide, coz that's the ocker ozzie way...
It's probably common in the US too, at least for the middle and upper class, as it is common for young people to move away to go to college.
Good lord. I find it ridiculous.
My husband and I both left home at 17. By 32 we had my father move in to our home with cancer needing care and mum got retrenched during the GFC and we loaned her money.
If you stay at home until you are in your 30s, don't be surprised if the freedom you just found is then taken away from you as your parents age and you need to care for THEM.
If I've done a half decent job with my kids they will want to leave home. They will want adventure and to be a grown up. They will have qualifications, an education, a job. Lots of friends to move into a rambling house where there isn't enough hot water and have the time of their lives. They will be tough and know you can't buy a house and go on overseas holidays or dine out. And either is a totally legit choice just don't moan about it either way.