By AVI VINCE
My boobs and I have a rocky relationship. It probably stems from when they first made an appearance in my life and seriously impeded my tomboy status.
They further irritate me by being uncooperative and give me a hoochy-mama Housewives-of-the-OC status in triangle bikinis. And sometimes they get annoyed by me wanting to cover them up – sorry about restraining you to a sports bra for the first two years by the way.
But like most relationships, there is something I take for granted every single day. And that is that my boobs are healthy.
We are all pretty smart women. But when it comes to breast cancer and mammograms, if you are anything like me, we become a bit ignorant and fall for some of the following breast cancer myths.
Just as an FYI, you should know that this post is sponsored by BreastScreen NSW. But all opinions expressed by the author are 100% authentic and written in their own words.
We don’t think about the almost 15,000 women who will be diagnosed with breast cancer by the end of the year. We don’t think about making an appointment to have a mammogram. Many of us don’t even know that breast screening is free for women over the age of 40 (and seriously encouraged for women aged 50-74).
Most of us don’t want to think it could ever happen to us. And instead, we hide behind breast cancer myths we’ve heard and convince ourselves that it ‘will never happen to me’.
So let me take this chance to get us all to come out from hiding and dispel all those myths:
I don’t have a family history of breast cancer
Consider yourself fortunate. You have been spared from having to watch a loved one battle cancer. But unfortunately, that is where the perks end. Take a deep breath while you read this stat: 9 out of 10 women who get breast cancer do not have a family history.
Top Comments
What this post is missing is letting us know that mammograms are not the last word in breast cancer detection. Younger women and women with dense breast tissue should request an MRI.
I was diagnosed with breast cancer this year, at 47, after years of specialist monitoring of my fibrocystic breasts AND after 2 "all clear" mammograms & ultrasounds this year. My breast specialist never mentioned the value of an MRI, and this has only been explained to me (by different specialists) since my diagnosis. While the MRI obviously wouldn't have prevented my cancer, it may have detected it early enough for me to save my breast and my lymph nodes.
Unfortunately, breast MRIs are not rebated by Medicare (unless you meet particular criteria) so mine cost me $400, even though I already had a positive breast cancer diagnosis. Despite this, I would have paid to do this screen yearly, if I had been made aware of its existence & value.
Breast MRI should be Medicare funded, and offered to more women, especially premenopausal women with denser breasts that are difficult to mammogram.
I found a lump in my breast in 2000 when I was 33. It turned out to be fibrocystic breast changes but due to a couple of small spots of calcification I was checked every year, initially twice a year. It took until 2008 for the pre-cancerous cells to show up and require an operation to remove the affected area. I went to a private clinic the whole time and spent an absolute fortune but it was worth every cent as my suspect cells never had the chance to form into a cancerous mass. Every day I thank the observant radiologist who noticed that one part of my breast "looked funny" and asked the doctor to perform a core biopsy. I will need to be checked yearly for the rest of my life and I'm happy with that.