A Game of Thrones fan theory proposed by a Reddit user/TV genius/possible GOT producer has us questioning everything we thought we knew.
It’s given us that feeling in our belly that comes along very, very rarely, when a work of fiction delivers a twist so profound and perplexing that we’re not sure if we understand everything, or absolutely nothing.
~so confused~
If you’re not up to date with the series, please stop reading now, because the theory is based on a telling scene from last week’s episode.
THAT’S RIGHT. STOP READING NOW IF YOU HAVEN’T SEEN LAST WEEK’S EPISODE.
Surprise, surprise: it centres on Bran. Let’s be honest – we all knew there was something suss about Bran. From the moment he fell from the tower (which he was specifically told NOT to climb) he set the show’s events into motion.
So last week, in one of Bran’s back-in-time scenes, he watches a fight between his father, Ned Stark, and a legendary knight, Ser Arthur Dayne. Ned appears to be headed towards the tower behind his opponent.
Ned Stark’s younger self was exceptionally cast (he has the same FACE), but that’s beside the point.
Ned Stark as a young man. Pre-beheading, etc etc. Image via HBO.
Bran watches on as his father and Ser Arthur duel, and eventually, a third man stabs Ser Arthur, leaving Ned Stark the victor. While Brynden Rivers (the old tree man) repeatedly tells Bran that they must leave, Bran continues to focus on his father. Ned hears screams coming from the tower, and proceeds to run up the stairs towards it.
Top Comments
Hodor. That is all.
Yes and no. I can see why the theory exists but I agree with what the Raven said, the ink is dry. Messing up the past just ruins and confuses everything. I think bran us being shown these visions of the past to prove jons parental heritage, ie R&L=J how else could it be proven? And maybe just maybe he learns to Warg into a dragon? Too many possibilities.