It’s the bizarre social media essay the jury never saw.
The only time the entire night’s events have been explained by Gable Tostee himself and, like many things Gable Tostee was involved in, it came in a strange form – a blog post on a body building forum.
The post, written in 2014, came four months after Warriena Wright fell from the balcony off the carpet layer to her death.
A jury of six men and six women last week found Gable Tostee not guilty of murder and of the lesser charge of manslaughter, following a nine-day trial in the Brisbane Supreme Court with four of them being deliberations.
Tostee never appeared on the stand in the case but in December 2014, he took to an online body building forum to explain what really occurred the night his 26-year-old Tinder date died.
In a lengthy post entitled, “regarding the balcony tragedy”, Tostee gave, for the first time, his version of her death – against all legal advice.
The full contents of the post are only now able to be made public as they were never submitted as evidence.
He wrote: “I think it’s time I spoke out about the events that have happened over the last few months.”
“Those aware will know I am referring to the tragic death of Warriena Wright.
“So far I’ve been silent” Gable Tostee told his fellow members leaving his “hands tied while so many misconceptions and untruths are being circulated in the media and in the public.”
Top Comments
If he wrote it himself and it were true, it's a reasonable and plausible account of events. I simply don't believe he wrote that himself, having heard the language he ordinarily uses online. I do think the right decision was made by the jury, I don't think he killed her or forced her hand, and that's the only important question despite how incredibly unlikable he is. And he really is.
But I don't think he wrote that alone, it sounds like an intelligent friend or advisor composed it.
Oh pass the tissues! So why did he decline to give evidence at the trial if it were all this simple. Poor diddums.
I have read your posts on many of these pages about Gable Tostee and as other posters have pointed out I am glad you are not on the jury. This young women was mentally ill. There is a full audio recording of the events and DNA all over the place. He never struck once despite being under seige for three hours. You have claimed falsely that he threatened to break her jaw ( She threatened to break his jaw) That he choked her ( The dr had said this was false) You end up using examples of behavior not relevant in any way to the case. She wouldn't leave the property of her own accord. She picked up the telescope next to the television which is only a metre away from the balcony. After enduring all this and finally being stabbed with a telescope. Yes, in theory he could have dragged her out the front instead but the balcony was more practical. Violence like that is not acceptable. Just because a men are stronger than women does give you the licence to be extremely violent.
What do you think forced her to take such extreme action then Kate B?. I have read many of your posts and you seem to never explain properly why he should be in jail. You claim he strangled her despite this being demonstrably false. You claim he threatened to break her Jaw( She threatened to break his jaw) You simply have shrugged of her extremely violent behavior and comments as something he should just put up with he is male.
The telescope was next to the TV which is outside the balcony door. After all that extremely bad behavior and bashing him with a telescope, why should he have dragged her all the way outside the flat when the balcony is one metre away and swore at her twice. To start screaming no frantically and attempting a feat of which she had no hope of success of survival. I strongly suggest the the entire conversation. The poor girl was out of her mind.
If your case is strong on the basis of the evidence, why in the would would you put all that evidence at risk by putting yourself at the mercy of a very smart barrister that could easily trick you up verbally?
His legal counsel would have advised him not to go on the stand and he has done as he was told even if it is quite likely he really really wanted to get up there and say what he did in that email. It is apparent he felt very frustrated by not being able to say his side of the story (because he was advised not to) and acted out by typing up and posting on the website. Not a legally very smart thing to do but frustration can drive people to do things.
Because his lawyers had a strategy and not being incarcerated was his first priority