by EM RUSCIANO.
I saw a headline today that put the fear of a small furry seal being approached by a great white, into me:
“Mum wins custody case after lunch box battle”.
Holy crap balls, I thought. That’s a thing? I mean that’s a thing they can bust you for or use against you? Instantly I thought back to all the times I’ve put chewy in as a snack or tried to wrap soup in foil. (Yes. I really did that. The result was not pretty – no tiny teddies survived that day.)
As I apprehensively clicked on the article, what I read was much, much worse.
It appears a custody battle has gone down and the mother in this situation felt that her child should not be living with her estranged husband because he did NOT cut up their son’s fruit, allowed him to eat chips and ice-cream and put plastic sandals on him.
SAY WHAT?!?
The providing of jam sandwiches and clothing issues were also sited as misdemeanors on the part of the father.
Where are we? www.PETTY.com
I just can’t. I don’t even know where to start with this one, so I’m going to put it down and walk away from it for now and pick up another angle.
Top Comments
My boyfriend has decided he will be super dad while I'll be tiger mum.
We are nowhere near having kids but God help me when we do...
"How was your afternoon with daddy?"
"Great, we watched Star Wars and ate dim sims."
How can I compete?