Brad Pitt has just announced that he’s making a movie about one of the most notorious rape cases in recent history.
He’ll tell the story of a 16-year-old girl raped by two guys at a party in Steubenville, Ohio in August 2012.
If you remember, the girl was sexually assaulted at a college party by two young footballers, both of whom were considered heroes in Steubenville. She was carried between party venues and abandoned. The next day, photographs of her unconscious body slung between two young men appeared on social media with a jovial ‘look what we did last night’ vibe. Friends of the boys bragged online about how ‘raped’ and ‘out of it’ she was.
What happened next is an indictment on the way we as a society prioritise male sporting prowess over the dignity of a female rape victim. An entire community, the 180,000 sports fans who live in Steubenville USA, rallied together to protect the girl’s attackers and vilify her for ruining their reputations. Several adults including a sports coach and parents of students covered up for the offending boys and got involved in legal battles of their own.
The people of Steubenville chose sporting heroism over the criminal violation of a woman’s body. Are we now choosing Hollywood movie-making over the privacy and dignity of the same victim? I think we are.
Top Comments
Enough of the high moral ground - read the Rolling Stone article and look at the focus of the film. It is on KYanonymous/Deric Lostutter's perspective. All reputable media would approach this with the well being of the victim in mind be it 4 Corners or a documentary that hardly any watches or a feature film that has the potential to reach millions and can potentially change mindsets. It is in the public domain and the story as hideous as it is on many fronts, needs to be told . To hide it shames us. Brad Pitt has a strong reputation working on human rights issues , there is no reason to doubt him.
Also, perhaps let's not sharpen our pitchforks and light our torches before a script has even been written. The fact is, we have NO IDEA what this movie will look like, or how the subject will be treated. Films are often only very loosely based on their source material. Why don't we, for now, give them the benefit of the doubt? This film has just as much potential to be powerful and tasteful, as it does to be disrespectful and intrusive. I, for one, have faith that it will be the former.