Waleed Aly has listed all of the times Bali Nine ringleaders Andrew Chan and Myuran Sukumaran were let down over the past 10 years.
In a powerful segment on The Project last night, host Waleed Aly detailed five moments Chan and Sukumaran were failed — by everyone from the Australian Federal Police, to Tony Abbott, to Indonesian authorities.
Aly, 36, pulled no punches as he described the series of mistakes and shocking failures that culminated in Chan and Sukumaran’s execution in the early hours of Wednesday morning.
Related content: Vale, Myuran Sukumaran and Andrew Chan.
The segment (scroll down for full video) is a must-watch. Here are the five points detailed by Aly:
1. When the case was referred to the Australian Federal Police.
In 2005, the father of Bali Nine member Scott Rush, contacted a barrister friend about the Bali Nine’s plans.
That friend told the AFP of the Bali Nine’s planned drug smuggling operation in the interest of stopping the team from traveling to Indonesia.
Top Comments
No one has remembered that some years ago we wouldn't allow a American convicted for murder here in Australia who served prison time in Queensland to be extradicted to the United States for re-trial (some years ago) because of their death penalty. He was only released to the FBI on the undertaking that he would not be put to death. This is in our law. So what the Federal police have done to Andrew and Myuran is really a breach of this law and a crime for which those police who are responsible for tipping of the Indonesian police should be arrested. This one point Waleed missed, but I agree with everything else he has said.
Has any one tried to count the times these two could have changed their minds and saved their own lives ? The federal police have to inform other countries if they have knowledge of a potential crime being committed in that country. It's the same international obligation that resulted in the U.K. police telling our police of a potential terrorist plot a few weeks ago.
Indonesia is a sovereign country. As Australian citizens in Australia, we have no say in their politics or laws. And they have no say in ours. If you are in another country you are subject to the laws of that country. You commit a crime there, you get punished there. Waving your hand and saying I'm an Aussie, treat me differently will not work.
The only point here where they were let down, is the refusal of spiritual counsel.
But which ever way you look at it capital punishment is cruel and barbaric ,no doubt about it.
Why the refusal of spiritual counsel, though? The Indonesian Attorney-General was very quick to come out and say that the "Bali 9 executions more perfect" http://www.smh.com.au/world... Really? And we're supposed to take the word of a corrupt government? But does that mean that the execution of a mentally ill patsy was less perfect?
I don't know why that was refused. It seems unnecessarily cruel. But Indonesia is still a sovereign state, corrupt or not. If you travel to a corrupt country you are still bound by it's laws. It doesn't stop people travelling to Indonesia or other countries in South East Asia, many of which are worse off for corruption.
Perhaps it was so that there would not be a reliable witness who could testify to the "cruel and barbaric" way in which the death penalty is administered. I have seen at least three different versions of the actual time it took them to die (ranging from 3-35 minutes) I believe none of them.