Update:
Chris Gayle has been fined $10,000 for his comments towards Ten Sports journalist Mel McLaughlin.
Gayle’s team, the Melbourne Renegades have announced the fine will be donated to the McGrath Foundation.
On the question on whether the player should be banned, the CEO said the player would not be excluded from the next Big Bash match:
“We didn’t think the situation would require a ban,” Renegades chief executive Stuart Coventry told a media gathering.
“We looked at the circumstances and we saw it as a one-off scenario.
“We looked at Chris’s attitude in previous Big Bash games and it was brilliant.”
Renegades CEO Stuart Coventry issued a statement:
“Chris’s comments were completely inappropriate and disrespectful. There is simply no place for these type of comments at the Melbourne Renegades.
“The club would like to extend a formal apology to Mel McLaughlin. Mel is an outstanding sports presenter. We think of her very highly and the club and players will ensure we work with her in a professional and respectful manner in future.”
Mamamia previously wrote…
Chris Gayle, a West Indian cricketer famous for building a “strip club” in his own home (and showing it off, along with the mirror above his bed on Instagram) was on fire last night playing for the Melbourne Renegades in the T20 competition.
Top Comments
A lot of men, including sportsmen, think that female sport's commentators are a bit of a joke.
They've been raised by "old-school" parents perhaps or they've immersed themselves in the macho culture that attaches itself to male-dominated sports.
Many "old-school" men still think that gender equality (feminism) is a novelty so that when they're confronted with a female doing what they believe is a "man's job" - their lack of respect for that female is obvious.
Is that what's happened here ?
I guess you'd have to be on the receiving end of his "intentions" to figure that out so I'd be trusting Mel's instincts this time.
It's heartening that the question's being asked at all now.
It wasn't so long ago that women were simply expected to "put up and shut up".
You say - "A lot of men, including sportsmen, think that female sport's commentators are a bit of a joke."
Some of them are "a bit of a joke".
HOWEVER some of the male sport commentators are a bit of a joke too. In fact, I think many more male sport commentators are a joke.
I think generally speaking female sports commentators probably work harder at their profession than most men, BUT that doesn't make them good at their job.
There are very ordinary female sport commentators who are there because they are attractive AND there are very ordinary male sport commentators there because they previously played the sport.
Being a "bit of a joke" is not gender based!
When a woman called AFL games TV research found that the great majority of women did not like it. If the TV viewers liked it - especially female viewers - we would still have female AFL commentators. We don't!
It was a case of other women not enjoying a woman calling an AFL game. GO FIGURE!!!!
“There wasn’t anything meant to be disrespectful or offensive to Mel. If she felt that way, I’m really sorry for that.”
Ah yes, the old non-apology apology:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wi...
Semantics really!
Let's re-work his own words ... "I apologise to Mel. There wasn’t anything meant to be disrespectful or offensive. I’m really sorry if she felt that way.”
Are you happy now? It's a just a reordering of his words.
The problem with your post is that you believe he was not sincere. He could be 100% sincere for all you know. I think he was. You cannot know what another person believes BUT it appears to me you automatically think he is lying because he is male.
Don't get me wrong, I think he is a fool, but too many people these days look for EVERY excuse as to why a person's apology is not a real apology.
For every misogynist there is a misandrist.
This is an apology: "I did the wrong thing, and I won't do it again."
Compare that with "I'm sorry you were offended."
Do you see/understand the difference?
Yes, it's semantics - that's the point. And you can't re-work his words because that would be misquoting him. This is professional sports - he would've been instructed on what to say by a Public Relations expert, paid for by his cricket team. He was just saying what he was told to.
He may be a fool, but his team's management aren't.
I see them as equally apologetic. You may not, but I am entitled to my opinion, as you are. I believe the great majority of people would have also seen that as an appropriate apology. You may not, but other people are entitled to their opinion.
I am sorry that I don't agree with you. Well, actually I am not sorry that I don't agree with. Does that make you wrong? No, of course not.
Does it make me wrong? No, of course not. We see things differently. It's a subjective issue.