Madonna apologies for racial slur on Instagram.
Madonna has been causing quite a stir on her Instagram account this year.
First came the penis shaped bong, then a photo of her 13-year-old son posing with alcohol, and now she’s taken it one step further.
The 55-year-old mother of four posted a photo of her son with former husband Guy Ritchie, Rocco, with the hashtag #disn*gga. However moments later the image was removed.
But that didn’t stop followers seeing it and labelling her racist, to which Madonna replied:
“Ok, let me start this again. #get off my d–k haters!”
The Material Girl apologised the following day, on Instagram:
Brynne Edelsten has ended her four-year marriage to Geoffrey Edelsten.
The 30-year-old reportedly told friends she was unable to forgive Edelsten for a reported affair with another woman more than 18 months ago.
According to News Ltd, “Edelsten was caught wooing an American woman on an online dating site and then lavished gifts on her during a secret three-day getaway in Florida in March 2012”.
Geoffrey, 70, has filed for bankruptcy in the United States and the pair reportedly attended marriage counselling in an attempt to save their marriage.
Top Comments
Cate Blanchett pictured at the Critics' Choice awards - serene, lovely, classic.
Cate Blanchett on the cover of Vogue Australia - bizarre, tacky, plasticky.
Shame, Vogue Australia, shame.
Actually, your evaluation and prejudgement of the Hillary Clinton Time cover sucks. As a fine art photographer I think Time's art director got it spot on. The essence of the portrait is the portrayal of the woman congruent to the intent of the article vis 'Hillary Clinton as the dominant force (declared or no) in the lead up to the next USA presidential election.'
Particularly as everyone knows what Hillary Clinton looks like so there's need to base an image on her looks. I cannot see one iota of your misperceived 'ball-breaker' intention or misogynistic portrayal of the image at all in any way, shape or form.
This is the true message of the image: "This woman is such a towering essence, her potency and presence so absolute, that so far all possible opponents are but ants!"
To portray it the way 'The Gloss' describes the cheap shot would have a man under the front part of the shoe.
'The Gloss' got it horribly wrong and you slavishly followed them - for shame! Also, when you bag out on your perception of why you think an image of her is wrong it would have been more politic to declare how you would have liked her to have been visually portrayed.
If you want a genuinely independent critique then ask this unemployed, disability pensioned, feminist photographer to do it for you. . . :-)