North Korean dictator dead, says official agency
North Korea’s ‘dear leader’ Kim Jong-Il has reportedly died of fatigue in a train carriage. The New York Times reported: Kim is believed to have suffered a stroke in 2008 but appeared relatively vigorous in photos and video from recent trips to China and Russia and in numerous trips around the country carefully documented by state media. The leader, reputed to have had a taste for cigars, cognac and gourmet cuisine, was believed to have had diabetes and heart disease.
The news came as North Korea prepared for a hereditary succession. Kim Jong Il inherited power after his father, revered North Korean founder Kim Il Sung, died in 1994. In September 2010, Kim Jong Il unveiled his third son, the twenty-something Kim Jong Un, as his successor, putting him in high-ranking posts.
Former Miss Venezuela Eva Ekvall passes away
She was just 28 years old and passed away two days ago from breast cancer. Eva was diagnosed last year at the age of 27. Eva Ekvall was the winner of Miss Venezuela and a finalist in the Miss Universe contest. “Sadly, cancer had the last word,” her management said. The SMH reported: The former beauty queen, who wrote a book after being diagnosed with breast cancer last year, used her public profile to raise awareness of the disease. “In Venezuela we invest a lot of money in looking beautiful and not in health care,” the former model said. “There’s a huge taboo around breast cancer. But in this country people get their boobs done every day, so I don’t understand how breast cancer can be a problem when everybody’s showing their breasts.”
Top Comments
Kim Jong Il. It was INEVITABLE.
Ok. Deep breath. Here I go..... an opinion that no-one will want to hear.
Re: More than 160 dead and missing as asylum boat sinks:
- When will the countries that these asylum seekers start taking ownership for their own citizens?
- Australia publicizes dangerous behaviours and tries to change society for the better (think drink driving, drugs, violence etc). What do other 3rd world countries do tot better their own society?
- Australia publisizes dangerous zones (roads, states due to natural disasters and other countries). What do other countries do to protect and eductate their own society?
- Why should we, as Australia, be taking on so much of other countries responsibilties when they are not willing to take on their own?
- Why should we continue to offer aid money and support to countries that clearly are corrupt, dangerous and not willing to help others?
- Why should we feel bad when a boat load of citizens not in our own waters goes down?
- I feel and recognise that they are people, humans, mothers, fathers, children etc ... however you don't see other countries bleeding their hearts out and bashing both of their own governments for not doing enough. Why are we?
- Why dont we focus 1/2 our energy on the homeless and lost children and families in Australia? I don't see 10% of the articles about our homeless in media as much as I do about our own troubles in Australia.
Finally.
What about the people that verbally bash the government and others for not doing enough - what are you doing to stop it?
I personally would prefer to hear a lot more about our lost youth, homeless and challenged parts of society rather than people ranting about something that they know they cannot change.
Rant, get angry over something that you can change - Australia.
Conditions in those countries are a lot worse than ours.
Are you saying these people are unimportant because they are not Australian?
That's pretty Unchristian and uncaring.
Only 10,000 arrive each year out of immigration of around 250,000, it's hardly Pauline Hanson's Yellow peril.
Hi Joe.
In response:
- No I am not saying they are unimportant.
- I would just like a lot more focus in Australia (not MM site) on the Australian issues rather than people ineffectively beating their chests about something they know they can not change.
- Yell about something we can change.
- I am not Christian
- I care a lot.
- My point is that their own country obviously does not care about them as they continue to not fight the issue on their own side. WHy are we tearing ourselves apart when their government and society aren't?
- If there are so little, why are we publicizing it so much - particularly when it is not in our own waters?
My entire point is we need to look at our own home first before we can try to clean up others homes.
I
Isabella...you would prefer to hear about our lost youth and homeless? And what will you do once you've heard...more to the point what are you doing?? I will be concerned if we as a country ever stop trying to find solutions to help not only our own people, but those that live in hardship and poverty beyond what most of us could ever comprehend!!
I am trying to do a lot Anonymous.
Rather than attacking how about suggesting how to work on both situations?
More stories in the media about our homeless, more donations and government funds. Rather than us sending the money overseas. More time spent donating to youth. I know I should and could do more.
Hence me raising the topic as a direct opposite of the article.
If people's hearts bleed, and they weep for the lost lives and continually call out for our government to change something, why dont we start putting the blame where it belongs.