How detectives pieced together a case with almost no clues to find a killer.
Detectives had only a few clues to Jill Meagher‘s disappearance on September 22, 2012: an abandoned bag, an unanswered phone call and a missing person’s report.
The bag was picked up off Hope St in Melbourne by a local on the night she was killed. It was later returned to where it was found – presumably because the thief was afraid of being implicated in the murder – and discovered by police.
Meagher had been on the phone to her brother in early hours of September 22, but did not answer minutes later when he tried to call her back.
Police had no other evidence about what might have happened to the bright 29-year-old.
Meagher’s case quickly became a priority for the missing persons unit. Although she had been gone little over 24 hours, Meagher’s case was flagged as unusual because she had never gone missing before.
In his first interview since the arrest of Adrian Bayley, head detective Senior Sergeant Dave Butler says he had a bad feeling about the Meagher case immediately.
“There was just something about it,’’ Butler said. “With missing persons, you develop a sense for it. Something was just not right. Who she was, the overall circumstances, there was no history of going missing.’’
Top Comments
I find this all a bit disturbing to be honest. While it may be interesting to know how the police found him, I think it's a little foolish to widely advertise the methods used by the police force. There are plenty of stupid people or people lacking in common sense these days. Police work (up to a point) relies on these criminals making mistakes, leaving evidence behind, etc. It seems very counter-productuve to educate them (in a round-about) way on how to get away with things.
In the end, that pathetic excuse for a man was caught by good old fashioned police work. Hats off to them. RIP Jill.