And here we are again. Debating at what price do we accept the astonishing cruelty to and the torture of Australian animals.
When the ABC’s 4 Corners exposed the incredibly brutal treatment of Australian cattle in Indonesian abattoirs last year, the footage was incredibly distressing. There was a massive public outcry. How could this be allowed to happen? Following intense pressure from the community, from animal rights industry and from the media, the Government was forced to take action.
A temporary ban on live cattle exports to Indonesia was put in place, until the Government could make arrangements for stricter rules and regulation to govern the treatment of our livestock being shipped to Indonesia for slaughter.
Perhaps naively, many of us presumed the issue had been ‘fixed’. We presumed that Australian livestock would now be slaughtered humanely and with dignity in Indonesia and in other countries to where our animals were exported.
We were so wrong.
A 4 Corners follow up, which aired last night investigated the events surrounding the absolutely horrific culling of 21,000 sheep in Pakistan. Video footage showed hundreds of sheep having their throats sawed crudely and mercilessly and then tossed into deep pits – many of them still alive.
The graphic images leave no doubt that those animals endured a terrifying ordeal and slow and agonising deaths. You can view the 4 Corners program in full here. Please be warned that the video is extremely distressing and you will never forget the images of those poor animals being tortured.
Top Comments
We already have a strong chilled/frozen meat export trade in Aust but the reason it hasn't (and can't) completely replace live exports is because they go to two very distinct markets. Fresh meat is bought by those who don't have access to refrigeration (generally the poorest people in Asia and the Middle East) while boxed/chilled meat goes to restaurants, high end supermarkets etc. Only around 15% of Indonesian homes have a fridge, so they buy fresh meat and store it in meat safes: it lasts much longer than frozen/chilled meat does when not refrigerated.
A very important point missing from this debate is the fact that Australia is THE ONLY country, of the more than 100 countries across the world that export livestock, that actively works in the countries it exports to, to help improve animal welfare. It's also the only country that regulates the system from the paddocks in Australia all the way to the point of processing overseas.
If Australia was to stop exporting livestock, the countries that we currently export to wouldn't switch to boxed/chilled meat - they'd simply seek live animals from other countries. We saw this in 2007. Australia couldn't meet the Middle East's demand for live animals, so they simply starting importing them from other countries - countries like Somalia, Iran and Sudan. Countries that do not share Australia’s strong commitment to animal welfare, and critically, may also pose disease risks to Australia and other countries through such diseases as food and mouth disease.
The simple fact is: if Australia was to stop exporting livestock, animal welfare conditions overseas would decline. The industry's committed to improving animal welfare and the supply chain assurance system is working: in Indonesia, stunning rates in abattoirs have jumped from 15% last year to over 80% this year under the new system.
That is good news regarding Indonesia, however I still can't accept the rest of your argument. It reminds me of the climate change mitigation argument - the "why should we mitigate here when our emissions as a nation are less than x,y,z countries". I feel it is missing the point to say we should not ban live exports of stock just because other countries with even worse welfare standards would move to fill the gap. Australia's animal welfare standards are not strong - they only look comparatively good compared to developing countries. We need to be accountable for our actions as a nation on their own merit (or lack of). There is nothing to stop Australia banning live export but still start/continue engaging with other countries to improve their animal welfare. It is not either/or.
With a name like Farmer Fred, shouldn't you know better? Or is animal brutality and industry criminality "commercial in confidence?"
http://tasmaniantimes.com/i...